A few years ago, Wi-Fi offered not much use to users, there weren’t that many public hotspots, social networks or cloud storage systems for storing photos, but this has dramatically changed in recent times. Cloud storage is now widely available for everyone to use, social networks like Facebook have encouraged mobile uploads of pictures, video sharing websites like YouTube offers lots of features for uploaders (and even the possibility to make money).
Why having Wi-Fi enabled cameras is a good idea
Just think of your smartphone: you take a picture and you can upload it to your cloud storage service or any social network in a few seconds. Also, if you have a home Wi-Fi network, you can instantly sync it to your computer, and even when you are not at home, just take pictures, and when you get there, the pictures will be waiting in your cloud account (I particularly love this feature). This makes your life much easier, and almost eliminates the need for a USB cable (also, with wireless charging, a feature that is present in most new mobile phones such as the HTC Droid DNA, LG Nexus 4 or Samsung Galaxy S 3) and freeing you of all ties to a computer or charging station makes a mobile device truly mobile. Why should digital camera users be deprived of such freedom? Although wireless charging for cameras hasn’t yet hit the market, Wi-Fi can still make the first step. And the nail in the coffin for this statement is the fact that even some of the cheapest point-and-shoot camera makes better pictures than a mobile device, even surpassing the mighty iPhone 5 or the LG Nexus 4, but users seem to be aiming for the gadget that offers the most features. If digital cameras would have integrated Wi-Fi, this would make some users think twice before going for that overpriced iPhone. So, as you see, a digital camera with integrated Wi-Fi does offer numerous advantages and it makes sense. We only hope that manufacturers see this opportunity and create more models with this feature. Here is a recap of what Wi-Fi in digital cameras could bring:
Quick upload to cloud storage Easy sharing on social networks Pictures could be uploaded automatically to your computer or smartphone Your pictures would be safe and you will not delete them by mistake If you forget your USB cable, you can just find the nearest hotspot and upload them Wireless control over the camera’s settings via your mobile device
Why aren’t Wi-Fi cameras so mainstream
So, we’ve concluded that Wi-Fi on a digital camera would be a great feature for manufacturers to implement, but this begs the question: Why don’t they? It would seem fairly simple, just add a new antenna to the camera and that’s it. Well, the fact of the matter is that this presents some issues that manufacturers first have to overcome. What type of issues does this rise, we will look at some of the most important of them and with time, it is our hope that the list of problems will get shorter and shorter, and in the near future, it will disappear entirely and we will be able to enjoy the benefits of wireless on our digital cameras. Here are the main issues posed by adding Wi-Fi capability for cameras:
The system is hard to set up – Existing digital cameras that have Wi-Fi capabilities also suffer from the lack of a decent setup menu. If this is not an issue for smartphones that have large touch screens and lots of options, you can imagine that the process is very complicated on a small screen. Lack of dedicated apps – Some manufacturers offer support for uploading pictures to a cloud storage system or social network, but the corresponding apps are under-developed and lack key features. Developers have to put some time to develop apps that allow you to connect your camera to a cloud service or a mobile device. The present apps need much more work to be deemed fit to accomplish the job. Also, they are pretty hard to set up and they are slow. Compatibility – For such a system to be widely implemented, the developers would have to create programs/apps that can span across different platforms. In this regard, some are still fragmented by only being available for a particular operating system. Security – This is a drawback that is of the utmost importance. If you cannot benefit from a high level of security, then the feature will never be fully implemented. Wi-Fi cameras offer users the possibility to upload pictures and videos from public hotspots. This aspect rises problems of its own, and security should be very high. Price – The existing Wi-Fi cameras come at slightly higher prices than regular cameras. But for users to adopt this feature, the price of the device should not vary from a regular device by too much. Also, there are models that can be fitted with Wi-Fi SD cards or Wi-Fi adapters, but these extras also cost more. The system should not affect the price of the camera by a large sum of money, otherwise, users will stick to the old fashioned devices.
Top 10 Wi-Fi enabled cameras
Even though there are some issues that still need to be ironed out, some manufacturers of digital cameras have seen the potential that these have and they have already taken steps towards making Wi-Fi a usual feature in their products. Thus, Wi-Fi enabled cameras are starting to emerge. More manufacturers are taking notice of the demand, and soon, we will see many more models hitting the market. Here are a few choices for those interested in buying a Wi-Fi camera. 10. Samsung Galaxy Camera 9. Sony Alpha NEX-6 8. Samsung DV300F 7. Olympus TG-610 6. Samsung NX20 5. Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS 4. Samsung NX210 3. Olympus E-3 2. Nikon D3S 1. Canon EOS-1D Mark IV As you can see, the trend that started when Samsung has rapidly been picked up by other digital camera manufacturers and implemented not only in point-and-shoot cameras, but also in DSLRs. This may very well be the start of a new age in the digital camera industry and the future might bring more smartphone-like features to the table. However, as we’ve seen from the newest smartphones to hit the market, the integrated cameras are getting better and better, so the race is on. Will smartphone manufacturers be able to create devices that could take the place of stand-alone cameras? What do you think?
